“The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail, its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter, the rain may enter — but the King of England cannot enter; all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement!” -William Pitt the Elder, 1st Earl of Chatham, Viscount Pitt of Burton-Pynsent ,byname The Great Commoner, 1708-1778)
UPDATE: Is anyone surprised that there were some wolves in sheep’s clothing in downtown Toronto today?
According to CBC News:
“Police in riot gear and protesters clashed during a massive anti-G20 protest march through downtown Toronto that saw at least two police vehicles set ablaze, store and bank windows damaged, and much of the area put under security lockdowns.
The police cruisers were set on fire at the corner of King and Bay streets in the heart of the city’s financial district. At one point, as one vehicle burned, protesters surrounded police officers who were trying to protect the car, CBC reporter Amber Hildebrandt reported on Twitter.
Police denied reports that tear gas was fired in at least two locations.
The size of the protest crowd has been estimated to be as high as 10,000.
The summit officially gets underway later Saturday with a working dinner hosted by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
With the violence escalating, the entire area around the actual summit site at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre is now under a security lockdown.”
|A protester kicks a burning police car in Toronto. Photograph: Ryan Remiorz/AP (via guardian.co.uk)
When you criminalize political expression with a secret law, you antagonize and incite radicalism.
Welcome to the Police State, also known as Toronto. Admittedly, it is a
pristine, tranquil and unadulterated police state; but a police state, nonetheless. Adorned with a fake lake, abandoned downtown streets and a lovely chain link fence cordoning off Toronto from any anarchists, miscreants, malcontents, troublemakers and ‘ne’er do wells’ who happen to traipse across the opaque blue line drawn by the G8/G20 summit security forces. George Orwell, we hardly knew ye. Toronto the Good. The Big Smoke. The T-Dot. These monikers are all so 20th century. We are the sheep whose wool has been pulled over our own eyes.
According to today’s CBC News report,
“Ontario’s cabinet quietly passed the new rules on June 2 without legislature debate.
Sgt. Tim Burrows of the G8/G20 Integrated Security Unit said the new regulations make parts of the existing Public Works Protection Act apply to the G20 security zone in downtown Toronto.
‘The public has nothing to fear with this legislation and the way the police will use this legislation,” said Burrows. “It really comes down to a case of common sense and officer discretion. If you’re approaching that fence line, we want to know why.’”
Ah, yes. Sgt. Burrows. Thank you for the officious, I mean official, explanation. These new powers under the Public Works Protection Act
O.Reg. 233/10 (“PWPA”)—-in effect on the streets and sidewalks in and around the security fence—were introduced on June 2nd, 2010 and published on June 16, 2010. I suppose it was too much to expect a public announcement of the passing of this new police state power before it went into effect. This new and improved version of the War Measures Act
(for those who are interested, there’s now an Emergencies Act
) is an impressive piece of legislative drafting, The powers under s.3 of the PWPA are sweeping in breadth and scope:
Powers of guard or peace officer
3.A guard or peace officer,
(a) may require any person entering or attempting to enter any public work or any approach thereto to furnish his or her name and address, to identify himself or herself and to state the purpose for which he or she desires to enter the public work, in writing or otherwise;
(b) may search, without warrant, any person entering or attempting to enter a public work or a vehicle in the charge or under the control of any such person or which has recently been or is suspected of having been in the charge or under the control of any such person or in which any such person is a passenger; and
(c) may refuse permission to any person to enter a public work and use such force as is necessary to prevent any such person from so entering. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.55, s. 3.
Just in case you didn’t get the memo, the PWPA creates a reverse onus offence; the burden of proof shifts to the accused to prove that an offence has not been committed:
Statement under oath to be conclusive evidence
4.For the purposes of this Act, the statement under oath of an officer or employee of the government, board, commission, municipal or other corporation or other person owning, operating or having control of a public work, as to the boundaries of the public work is conclusive evidence thereof. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.55, s. 4.
Refusal to obey guard, etc.
5.(1)Every person who neglects or refuses to comply with a request or direction made under this Act by a guard or peace officer, and every person found upon a public work or any approach thereto without lawful authority, the proof whereof lies on him or her, is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $500 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two months, or to both.
(2)A guard or peace officer may arrest, without warrant, any person who neglects or refuses to comply with a request or direction of a guard or peace officer, or who is found upon or attempting to enter a public work without lawful authority. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.55, s. 5. [emphasis added]
How did this tidbit of Solonic legislating get passed in the first place? Who knows? Who cares? It’s next to impossible to rally the sheep to jump the fence. Fear not my fellow sheep. We are safe and secure. Just say this prayer with me aloud:
THE PREMIER IS MY SHEPHERD
The Premier is my shepherd,
I shall not want;
He makes me lie down in asphalt pastures.
He leads me beside still fake lake waters;
He restores my faith in the economy.
He leads me in paths without fences.
for His name’s sake.
Yea, Even though I walk through the Don Valley
of the shadow of downtown,
I fear no evil;
for You, Dalton and your security forces are with me;
Your truncheons and your PR staff, they comfort me.
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me
all the days of my life;
and I shall dwell in the outhouse of parliament,
As far as the jaundiced eye can see, the G8/G20 Summit is not a prelude to declaration of war, unless you consider fighting a global economic crisis “A War on Poverty”.
I hope that the G8/G20 leaders from the strongest of industrialized nations are invited by Premier Dalton McGuinty to take a walking tour down at Queen’s Park this weekend. There they will chance upon a beautiful, yet austere building, built in the Richardsonian Romanesque style with a load bearing iron frame called the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. This is where democratically elected politicians, known as Members of Provincial Parliament, convene to debate, draft and hopefully pass laws in the public interest. Do you recall any notice to the public before this Order-in-Council was passed in the backroom?
Sadly, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. sagely observed, “the common law is not a brooding omnipresence in the sky”. According to a breaking CBC News story:
“[Justice Brown of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice] has dismissed a motion that sought to ban police use of so-called sound cannons to control crowds during the G20 summit in Toronto.
While Friday’s decision allows police to use the devices, it also places limits on how they can use them. Police must conform to Ontario Provincial Police operating rules for the cannons, the judge said.”
Will the boom of sound cannons be replaced by the sound of voices mingled with the clear tintinnabulation of democracy? Move along, nothing to see here.