Conrad Black has a few options to ponder following his release from a Florida prison today. After recently being granted a temporary resident permit by the Harper government, he may still be deported to the U.K., having renounced his Canadian citizenship more than a decade ago to become a British citizen and accepting a Peerage with the House of Lords. (more…)
Archive for the ‘Conrad Black’ Category
Good News/Bad News: Conrad Black Released from Florida Prison; Denied Leave to Appeal Settlement Privilege DecisionMay 4, 2012
Following up on yesterday’s post, this will be a two-part series of posts on the Supreme Court of Canada conflict of laws trilogy in:
Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (“Van Breda”);
Éditions Écosociété Inc. v. Banro Corp., 2012 SCC 18 (“Banro”) and
Breeden v. Black, 2012 SCC 19. (“Black”).
In Part I, I will critically analyze the Van Breda decision and its implications to Canadian conflict of laws generally. In Part II, I will discuss the Banro and Black decisions from the perspective of internet defamation, corporate liability, choice of law and libel tourism. (more…)
As Conrad Black (a.k.a. Lord Black of Crossharbour) awaits the outcome today of his resentencing hearing before U.S. Federal Court judge Amy St. Eve, who presided over Black’s original trial in 2007, another interesting development merits consideration.
According to various news sources, including The Canadian Press (via CTV News) :
Disgraced media mogul Conrad Black, who has seen his fortune nearly wiped out in his ongoing legal saga, will receive a handsome settlement for a series of libel suits.
His lawyer, David Jenkins said Thursday — the eve of his re-entering hearing — that Black has settled some libel-related lawsuits against his former associates at Hollinger International Inc. and the man who wrote the report that helped send him to jail.
“Hollinger International’s successor company, Sun Times Media Group, attached a substantial value to the libel action in the settlement figure that will be paid to Mr. Black,” Jenkins said in a statement.
Details of the settlement are not being disclosed until the settlements are granted approval in Delaware and Illinois.
Readers may recall Black’s libel action was the subject of a jurisdiction motion that ended up in the Ontario Court of Appeal: Black v. Breeden, 2010 ONCA 547 and was discussed in my previous posts here and here. More recently, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave and the appeal was argued on March 21, 2011: Richard C. Breeden, et al. v. Conrad Black, et al. (Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave) 33900 with the Court’s decision currently under reserve.
Given that the litigation has now settled (pending formal approval), the Supreme Court of Canada’s much anticipated decision is now moot. It is likely that Black’s counsel will soon file a Discontinuance under Rule 93 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada, SOR/2002-156 as amended by SOR/2006-203, SOR/2011-74. All is not lost, however, as the Supreme Court of Canada has also heard arguments on March 25, 2011 and reserved its decision in Les éditions Écosociété Inc., et al. v. Banro Corporation (Civil by Leave) 33819, which provides a welcome opportunity for the Court to clarify the law of jurisdiction in internet defamation or cyberlibel cases.
“U.S. Judge Amy St. Eve sentenced Black to 3 1/2 years in prison, but prosecutors say he will be given credit for the about two years he already had served. The resentencing came after an appeals court decision last year.” via Business Week: Read more
“Having already spent 29 months in jail, and with additional credit for good behaviour, Black is now expected to spend between eight and 13 more months behind bars. He can appeal the ruling, but it was unclear Friday whether he would.” via Winnipeg Free Press: Read More
According to the SCC Case Information Docket (and as I predicted):
|2011-06-22||Correspondence received from, Mr. Cherniak re: settlement underway, with cc. to all parties (sent to the Court June 23/11)||Conrad Black|
The National Post reports today on a dispute over the opposing characterizations of the terms of the pending out-of-court civil settlements (not yet memorialized) reached between Conrad Black and Chicago Newspaper Liquidation Corp (CNCL), the company formerly known as Hollinger and Sun-Media Inc.:
“Under the tentative settlement, neither Chicago Newspaper Liquidation Corp, nor the defendants in the defamation actions are paying anything to Mr. Black,” a New York-based lawyer who asked not to be named told the National Post.
According to the preliminary deals, Lord Black will receive money “from insurance proceeds that have been in dispute, as will the company,” the source explained. “Mr. Black will be dismissing and releasing all of his claims in his defamation actions, and neither the company nor the people he sued for defamation are paying him a penny.”
And apparently, there will be no apologies or regrets by anyone.
Not so, says the former media baron. During his 25-minute speech to Chicago Judge Amy St. Eve during his resentencing on June 24, Lord Black declared, “My libel suit, and several other lawsuits around this case, are being settled, including a sizeable payment to me on the libel claim.”
- Black to receive ‘substantial’ libel settlement (cbc.ca)
- Black to see ‘substantial’ payout from libel settlement (ctv.ca)
- Conrad Black to learn fate in U.S. court Friday (ctv.ca)
- U.S. judge to resentence Conrad Black (cbc.ca)
- Will Conrad Black go back to jail? (theglobeandmail.com)
- Conrad Black may escape more jail time Friday (ctv.ca)
- Conrad Black could avoid more prison time (cbc.ca)