THE TRIAL WARRIOR BLOG

 Catherine R. Gellis (Digital Age Defense) has published “2012 State of the Law Regarding Internet Intermediary Liability for User-Generated Content“, Business Lawyer, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2012 which contains a summary of key cases regarding 47 U.S.C. Section 230 and 17 U.S.C. Section 512.

Related articles

• A Brief Primer on Section 230 Protections (performancing.com)
• Hunter Moore of IsAnyoneUp.com announces new revenge porn website (guardian.co.uk)
• EFF’s Guide to CDA 230: The Most Important Law Protecting Online Speech (eff.org)
• Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act: Why Twitter apologized over NBC Olympics flap (nextlevelofnews.com)
• Hunter Moore of IsAnyoneUp.com announces new revenge porn website (rawstory.com)
• Mohamed Ali Saeh, “Online Defamation and Intermediaries’ Liability: International” (thetrialwarrior.com)
• On-Line Rating Provider — Ratingz — Preemptively Sues Law Firm Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (pubcit.typepad.com)
• Florida Appeals Court Recognizes That Section 230 Immunity Extends to Injunctive Relief – Even When the Content Provider Collaborates in Seeking an Injunction (pubcit.typepad.com)

Tags: Blog, Communications Decency Act, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Internet service provider, Law, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, United States, User-generated content

This entry was posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:50 pm and is filed under 17 U.S.C. Section 512, 47 U.S.C. Section 230, blawging, Blawgosphere, blawgs, blog, communications, hyperlinking, intermediaries, intermediary liability, internet, internet defamation, internet jurisdiction, internet law, Internet Service Providers, Online Defamation, Section 230, user-generated content, website. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.