<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Supreme Court of Canada Conflict of Laws Trilogy: Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetrialwarrior.com/2012/04/19/the-supreme-court-of-canada-conflict-of-laws-trilogy-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetrialwarrior.com/2012/04/19/the-supreme-court-of-canada-conflict-of-laws-trilogy-part-i/</link>
	<description>Strategic blawging about law and justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:49:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ontario court recognizes Italian judgment - Letters Blogatory</title>
		<link>http://thetrialwarrior.com/2012/04/19/the-supreme-court-of-canada-conflict-of-laws-trilogy-part-i/#comment-14757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ontario court recognizes Italian judgment - Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetrialwarrior.com/?p=3622#comment-14757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The appeal, originally scheduled to be heard on May 30, 2011,was adjourned pending the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Charron Estate and a companion case. The Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision on April 18, 2012 under the style Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (see my previous analysis here). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The appeal, originally scheduled to be heard on May 30, 2011,was adjourned pending the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Charron Estate and a companion case. The Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision on April 18, 2012 under the style Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (see my previous analysis here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Supreme Court of Canada: internet defamation, choice of law and libel tourism – Antonin I Pribetic « Inforrm's Blog</title>
		<link>http://thetrialwarrior.com/2012/04/19/the-supreme-court-of-canada-conflict-of-laws-trilogy-part-i/#comment-10038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Canada: internet defamation, choice of law and libel tourism – Antonin I Pribetic « Inforrm's Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetrialwarrior.com/?p=3622#comment-10038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] post is the second of a two-part series of posts on the recent Canadian conflict of laws trilogy in Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda, 2012 SCC [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post is the second of a two-part series of posts on the recent Canadian conflict of laws trilogy in Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda, 2012 SCC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
